previous
next

(b) METHODS OF ALLOCATION

The only methods of apportionment provided by the law and actually employed in Latvia are the method of separate accounting and the empirical method. Fractional apportionment is never used. We shall see below the circumstances in which one of the two methods employed is preferred to the other.

1. Method of Separate Accounting

Whatever method may be used to assess the profits that a foreign enterprise earns from its Latvian business, the basic rule is that tax must be assessed exclusively upon the profits that represent business done by branches and establishments situated in Latvia.

The method of separate accounting, however, is only compulsory in the case of enterprises belonging to companies, which, as we know, have to forward a copy of their balance-sheet when making their return. Other enterprises may choose between this method and the empirical method, which consists of applying a coefficient to turnover.

When a foreign enterprise is taxed on the basis of its separate accounts, it forwards along with its return a copy of the special balance-sheet and a copy of the balance-sheet of all operations of its Latvian establishments; it must also send the minutes of its general meeting, within a month thereof. These last two documents are required to check the special balance-sheet.

The data of this sheet will be compared with the separate accounts of the Latvian establishments and with the documents on which these accounts are drawn up. The usual rules for auditing accounts are observed, but special attention is paid to documents referring to business done with the foreign part of the enterprise, to make sure that the invoiced prices are normal and that no profits have been secretly transferred.

Care is taken to see not only that the various transactions were conducted under normal conditions, but that the net profits are those which would have been ascertained by the application to turnover of the coefficients resulting from the general scale fixed by the tax committees for the different kinds of enterprise.

However, if the net profits, though lower than those resulting from this latter method of calculation, correspond to bona-fide accounts and reflect the real results of the Latvian establishment, regarded as a separate enterprise, they are accepted as the basis of taxation.

2. Empirical Method

Taxable profits are assessed empirically in the following cases:

The empirical figure is reached by applying a certain coefficient to the enterprise’s turnover and corresponds to the net profit. Accordingly, when the taxable sum is determined empirically, no account is taken of the expenses deductible when the enterprise is assessed according to its accounts (see page 290).

The coefficient is fixed by the general tax committee on a scale which divides industrial enterprises into classes according to their kind and purpose (see page 289). Minimum and maximum profit percentages are fixed for each class and the tax committee selects the rate it thinks suited to the particular enterprise.

These rates, however, may be reduced to nothing if the taxpayer can satisfy the committee that his real profit is less than the figure resulting from the coefficient. The committee, too, may increase the percentage indefinitely if the latter does not seem to it to reflect the real results of the enterprise.

The turnover figure on which the calculation is based is determined from the accounts or is based on some assumed figure.

previous
next